Skip Site Navigation
Skip Site Navigation

Articles and Chapters | Books | External Activities | Miscellaneous | Phd Supervision | Reports | Research Interests | Teaching

Peter Jaffey

Title: Professor of Law
   
Administration: Director of Research
   
Email: peter.jaffey@brunel.ac.uk
Office: Marie Jahoda Room 121
Direct Line: +44(0)1895 266859
Fax: +44(0)1895 269875
   
Qualifications:

BA – (Cantab)

LLM – (London)

Solicitor 
 
Teaching

Trusts
Company Law
Intellectual Property

Research Interests

Private Law Theory

Restitution and Unjust Enrichment

Intellectual Property

PhD Supervision

 

External Activities

 

Books

Private Law and Property Claims (Hart Publishing, 2007)

Further information Contents

 

The Nature and Scope of Restitution (Hart Publishing, 2000)

Further information Contents

  

Articles and Chapters in Books

“Liabilities in Private Law” 14 Legal Theory 233-255 (2008)

 

“Privacy, Confidentiality and Property”, in P Torremans ed., Intellectual Property and Human Rights (Kluwer Law International, 2008), 447-474.

 

“Damages and the protection of contractual reliance”, in R Cunnington & D Saidov, Contract Damages: Domestic and International Perspectives (Hart Publishing, 2008), forthcoming.

“Contract, unjust enrichment and restitution: the significance of classification”, in P Giliker, ed., Re-Examining Contract and Unjust Enrichment (Martinus Nijhoff, 2007).

Review of Hanoch Dagan, The Law and Ethics of Restitution (2007) 3 International Journal of Law in Context 73-80.

“Duties and liabilities in private law”, 12 Legal Theory 137-156 (2006).   Available here

“Classification and unjust enrichment” (2004) 67 Modern Law Review 1012-1031. Available here

Rights of privacy, confidentiality, and publicity, and related rights” in P Torremans, ed., Copyright and Human Rights (Kluwer Law Int, 2004), 157-181.

“Disgorgement and ‘licence fee damages’ in contract” (2004) 20 Journal of Contract Law 57-73.       Available here

“Hohfeld’s power-liability/right-duty distinction in the law of restitution” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence Vol XVII 295-313 (2004).

“Two theories of unjust enrichment” in J Neyers et al, eds., Understanding Unjust Enrichment (Hart, 2004).

“The theory of unjust enrichment” in A Hudson, ed., New Perspectives on Property Law, Obligations and Restitution (Cavendish, 2004)

“Principle or dogma?” [2003] Restitution Law Review 228-34.

Review of Johnston & Zimmermann, Unjustified Enrichment (2003)119 LQR 337-341

“Merchandising in English law” in Ruissenaars, ed, Character Merchandising in Europe (Kluwer, 2003) (with Nic Couchman).

“Failure of consideration” (Roxborough v Rothmans) (2003) 66 Modern Law Review 284-93  Available here

“Efficiency, disgorgement, and reliance in contract: a comment on Campbell and Harris” (2002) 22 Legal Studies 570-77.

“In rem claims to wealth and surviving value” (2002) 55 Current Legal Problems 263

“Likelihood of association” [2002] EIPR 3-8.

“Privacy, publicity rights and merchandising” in E Barendt & A Firth, eds., The Yearbook of Copyright and Media Law , 2001/2002 (OUP, 2002), 21-27.

“Change of position and estoppel” ( Derby v Scottish Equitable) [2002] LMCLQ 1-6.

“Restitutionary Claims arising on Contractual Termination” in Schrage, ed., Unjust Enrichment and the Law of Contract (Kluwer, 2001), 243-255.

“The nature of knowing receipt” [2001] Trust Law International 151-58.          Available here

Review of Enonchong, Illegal Transactions [2000] LMCLQ 444-46.

Review of Spence, Protecting Reliance [2000] Restitution Law Review 458-64.

“Disgorgement for breach of contract” [2000] Restitution Law Review 578-87.

“Tracing, property, and unjust enrichment” [2000] Trust Law International 194-99.

“Missing reliance” (2000) 63 Modern Law Review 918-28

“Restitution, reliance, and quantum meruit” (Countrywide) [2000] Restitution Law Review 270-75.

“Accident car hire and the recovery of damages” (Dimond v Lavell) [2000] LCMLQ 449-55.

“Law Commission Report on aggravated, exemplary and restitutionary damages” (1998) 61 Modern Law Review 860-869.

“The restitutionary conditional transfer analysis and the death of contract” [1998] Edin LR 23-55.

 “A new version of the reliance theory” [1998] Northern Ireland LQ 107-138.

“Merchandising and the law of trade marks” [1998] Intellectual Prop Quarterly 240-266

“Disgorgement for breach of contract and for a criminal offence” (A-G v Blake) [1998] LMCLQ 469-75.

“Failure of consideration and reliance in contract” (Latvian Shipping) [1998] Restitution Law Review 157-61.

“Auditors’ liability to shareholders” (Hercules) [1998] Company, financial & insolvency Law Review 142-47.

Review of Cheffins, Company Law [1998] Company, financial & insolvency Law Review 152-56.

“The new European law of trade marks” [1997] Int Rev of Indus Prop & Cpyrt Law 153-191

“Restitution and trespass to land” (Re Polly Peck) [1997] Restitution Law Review 79-83.

“Disgorgement and confiscation” ( Halifax v Thomas) [1996] Restitution Law Review 92-100.

“Contractual obligations of the company in general meeting” (1996) 16 Legal Studies 27-50

Review of Boros, Minority Shareholders' Rights (1996) 16 Legal Studies 428-32.

“Restitutionary damages and disgorgement” [1995] Restitution Law Review 30-48

“Accounting for wrongful profits” (Warman v Dwyer) [1995] LMCLQ 462-466.

“Restraining the exercise of statutory corporate powers” [1994] Denning Law Journal 67-91

Lee Panavision v Lee Lighting” (1994) 14 Company Lawyer 22-26.

Re Cleveland Trust PLC” (1992) 13 Company Lawyer 60-63.

  

Reports

 

Miscellaneous

SLS (SPTL) Prize for Outstanding Legal Scholarship by Younger Scholars (2001), joint winner.

 

 

Back to top of page
Back to top of page
© Brunel University 2010