Wellbeing and income inequality are taking centre stage in policy-making and the measurement of national success. The interests of economists, social scientists, policy makers and others on the relations of well-being , income, demographics, health, education, religion and employment, have generated a vast global literature.
Some of the measurements of these variables are in a bounded range, such as the London ward where the wellbeing scores are a combined measure based on 12 different indicators. All scores have known bounded ranges between 0 and 1, and over 0 indicate a higher probability that the population, on average, will experience better well-being. Similarly, the Gini coefficient of income distributions is the most commonly-used measure of income inequality that condenses the entire income distribution for a country into a single number between 0 and 1: the higher the number, the greater the degree of income inequality.
Statistical analysis of this type of variables is very complex and requires great level of care. By analysing the publicaly available data, this project aims to develop new regression methods to model the relationships between well-being, income, demographics, education, religion, employment and so on, and therefore, provides a useful tool for clear description of the factors affecting wellbeing and income inequality. This is turn will help suggests concrete actions for policy-making and data collection.
This project will answer some of the following questions:
- Are Londoners or British people happy? Why?
- Is there income mobility in London, England and even whole UK? And how?
- Will we be “objectively” better off /happier after Brexit? Why?
- How well-off are we as a developed country compared to other developed countries?